Wednesday, 02 December 2020
Standardization of Goods Prices in East Kalimantan
samarinda, 11/10/12. The central government should not generalize the price of goods in the area of East Kalimantan, especially in the northern part of East Kalimantan ![]()
with other regions, especially in the island of Java, because this will never find the end point, because the prices of goods in East Kalimantan, especially the north or border areas near Malaysia as an example of the cheapest cement price of Rp. . 750 thousand to the highest price reached Rp. 1.5 million, this is a real price in East Kalimantan not to mention the price ratio of the basic goods for the needs of the community is very high when compared to other regions.
This was revealed by the Mandiri National Community Empowerment Program Evaluation Team (PNPM) was revealed during the Rural Development Index Meeting in the Second Floor Propeda Meeting Room of the East Kalimantan Bappeda Office, Jl. Kusuma Bangsa Number 2 Samarinda, led directly by the Head of Human Development, Drs. Hariyo Santoso. This meeting was held in collaboration with the Ministry of National Development Planning/National Development Planning Agency, attended by participants of approximately forty -five people, consisting of the SKPD both the East Kalimantan Provincial Government and the Regency/City Government in East Kalimantan.
In accordance with the presentation material delivered by the Ministry of National Development Planning/Bappenas which in this case the Director of Urban and Rural Development in the field of regional development and regional autonomy, the background of this activity includes: 1. Identify potential, problems and challenges that are still faced in rural development in Indonesia; 2. Map the status or level of village development in Indonesia so that it can help in determining the right intervention for villages in accordance with their respective conditions; 3. Map all villages in Indonesia according to the ranking and pace of development, development benefits, to the impact of development; 4. Utilizing the ranking and pace of villages for sectoral and regional development planning and evaluation.
While the purpose of this activity is the preparation of the Rural Development Index with the following targets: 1. The theoretical basis for the preparation of the Rural Development Index; 2. Identification of construct, variables and criteria that reflect the level of rural development progress; 3. Identification of rural development indicators; 4. Identification of the weight of each criterion and indicators of rural development, and 5. Preparation of the Rural Development Index.
The expectation of the rural development index is the participation of the discussion of the participants who attended so that they could provide ideas, suggestions and criticisms for the process of preparing this rural development index both in aspects of the foundation of thought, variables and indicators, as well as data analysis. direction of development The village in the long run in accordance with the 2005-2025 RPJPN is the equal distribution of the community and increasing the competitiveness of the village. According to PP 72/2005 concerning Villages, village formation is directed at the welfare of the community. In general according to Law Number 32 of 2004 concerning Regional Autonomy is directed at the welfare of the community, public services, and regional competitiveness. In Amendment IV of the 1945 Constitution, it is composed of the integration of the National Economy and Social Welfare in Chapter XIV.  to the development of rural areas. Consequently the substance of rural development includes various development sectors. </p>
<p> While the results of seminars on development indicators by the United Nations and OECD, as well as comparisons of rural development indicators by the United Nations and OECD, it was agreed that rural development indicators were more precisely composite, compared to single. Indicators of rural development composite include: standard material, infrastructure, health, education, individual activities, social relations, environment, insecurity, politics and governance, and competitive economy. </p>
<p> Rural Development Index is directed to be used in all villages in Indonesia which can be stated as KOR or the core of rural development. Besides that, rural diversity is formulated as a constant for regional and sectoral attributes. </p>
<p> The attributes of the region include the area of large islands, provinces, districts/cities, disadvantaged, outermost, border, remote, post -conflict, disaster. Sectoral attributes include tourist villages, energizing energy, legal awareness, telematics basis, and various superior programs of the Ministry / Institution. </p>
<p> In accordance with the comparison of the preparation of rural development indicators in various countries, the value of development is compiled compositely. At this time there are two alternatives, namely: a. The composite value for each index, so as to obtain the 6 development index above; b. The composite value is only one index which includes composite all 6 indexes above. (Public Relations Bappeda Kaltim/Sukandar, S. Sos). </p>
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class=)
